Directory / coil.trade
coil.trade/learn/research/does-buying-a-neglected-stock-after-a-big-volume-gap-up-beat-the- working
https://coil.trade/learn/research/does-buying-a-neglected-stock-after-a-big-volume-gap-up-beat-the-market/full
Before you pay
- Advice
ok- Protocol
- x402 · http · GET
- Asks for
- 0.1 USDC on base
- Catalogue says
- 0.1 USDC
- Pays to
0x7B53524d5c5D29EfB8C1d128C56F62FE38Cd9476- Last check
- 5 min ago · 181 ms · HTTP 402
- Detail
- 402 with valid terms
Reliability
- Uptime 24 h
- 100.0%
- Uptime 7 days
- 100.0% (57 checks)
- Uptime 30 days
- 100.0% (signed daily)
- Paid calls 30 d
- 4 from 1 payers (x402 Bazaar)
- Listed by
- x402-bazaar
- First seen
- 2026-11-05 22:10 UTC
Description (from the catalogue, unverified)
After a liquid, neglected US stock gaps up 10% or more on at least 3 times its normal volume, does buying the next open and trailing a 10-day average beat the S&P 500 net of costs? Pre-registered Backtrader backtest, 10.5 years of daily bars, liquid US stocks (2016-01-01 to 2026-06-30) — verdict: THIN. Not enough evidence either way. Full text of the study, one read. A published study, not advice.
Signed history
| When | Statement | Log index |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-07 00:11 UTC | 90401d7c…5175aa daily summary | 97631 |
| 2026-11-06 00:08 UTC | 215cad77…0070b7 daily summary | 11193 |
Verify any statement offline: how.
For agents and owners
JSON: https://alalanet.com/v1/services/6iwo5odgymod77jd
Badge:
<a href="https://alalanet.com/s/6iwo5odgymod77jd"><img src="https://alalanet.com/badge/6iwo5odgymod77jd" alt="alalanet status"></a>Own this service? Get verified. Do not want it checked? See the prober page.